Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.

View Abstract

BACKGROUND

Timing of initiation of screening for breast cancer is controversial in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the threshold relative risk (RR) at which the harm-benefit ratio of screening women aged 40 to 49 years equals that of biennial screening for women aged 50 to 74 years.

DESIGN

Comparative modeling study.

DATA SOURCES

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, and medical literature.

TARGET POPULATION

A contemporary cohort of women eligible for routine screening.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Societal.

INTERVENTION

Mammography screening starting at age 40 versus 50 years with different screening methods (film, digital) and screening intervals (annual, biennial).

OUTCOME MEASURES

BENEFITS

life-years gained, breast cancer deaths averted; harms: false-positive mammography findings; harm-benefit ratios: false-positive findings/life-years gained, false-positive findings/deaths averted.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

Screening average-risk women aged 50 to 74 years biennially yields the same false-positive findings/life-years gained as biennial screening with digital mammography starting at age 40 years for women with a 2-fold increased risk above average (median threshold RR, 1.9 [range across models, 1.5 to 4.4]). The threshold RRs are higher for annual screening with digital mammography (median, 4.3 [range, 3.3 to 10]) and when false-positive findings/deaths averted is used as an outcome measure instead of false-positive findings/life-years gained. The harm-benefit ratio for film mammography is more favorable than for digital mammography because film has a lower false-positive rate.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The threshold RRs changed slightly when a more comprehensive measure of harm was used and were relatively insensitive to lower adherence assumptions.

LIMITATION

Risk was assumed to influence onset of disease without influencing screening performance.

CONCLUSION

Women aged 40 to 49 years with a 2-fold increased risk have similar harm-benefit ratios for biennial screening mammography as average-risk women aged 50 to 74 years. Threshold RRs required for favorable harm-benefit ratios vary by screening method, interval, and outcome measure.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Cancer Institute.

Abbreviation
Ann. Intern. Med.
Publication Date
2012-05-01
Volume
156
Issue
9
Page Numbers
609-17
Pubmed ID
22547470
Medium
Print
Full Title
Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.
Authors
van Ravesteyn NT, Miglioretti DL, Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Buist DS, Huang H, Heijnsdijk EA, Trentham-Dietz A, Alagoz O, Near AM, Kerlikowske K, Nelson HD, Mandelblatt JS, de Koning HJ